References
A
Adams, B. (2021). Advancing the collection of juvenile justice data. National Institute of Justice, https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/255642.pdf
Agnihotri, V., Bailey, S. D., Liebert, J., & Melhorn, S. (2022, July/August). Trending: Knowledge management 2022. AALL Spectrum, 11.
Ahmed, R., et al. (2020). Challenges and strategies in conducting sexual and reproductive health research among Rohingya refugees in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Conflict and Health, 14(1), 1-8.
American Association of Law Libraries (2010). AALL competencies of law librarianship. https://www.aallnet.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/AALL-Competencies-of-Law-Librarianship.pdf
American Library Association. (2009). Core competencies. https://www.ala.org/educationcareers/careers/corecomp/corecompetences
Anbari, A. B., Wanchai, A., & Graves, R. (2020). Breast cancer survivorship in rural settings: A systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28(8), 3517-3531.
Angioli, S., & Kaplan, P. (2017). Some things are just better left as secrets: Non-transparency and prosecutorial decision making in the era of neoliberal punitivism. The Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice and Criminology, 5(1).
Ares, G., & Varela, P. (2017). Trained vs. consumer panels for analytical testing: Fueling a long lasting debate in the field. Food Quality and Preference, 61, 79-86.
Arias-Londoño, A., Montoya, O. D., & Grisales-Noreña, L. F. (2020). A chronological literature review of electric vehicle interactions with power distribution systems. Energies, 13(11), 3016.
Aronson, J. D. (2018). Computer vision and machine learning for human rights video analysis: Case studies, possibilities, concerns, and limitations. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1188-1209.
Ayres, I., & Vars, F. E. (2000). Determinants of citations to articles in elite law reviews. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 427-50.
B
Balkin, J. (1998). John Henry Schlegel, American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1995 [book review]. Law and History Review, 16(1), 199-201.
Bancroft Library. (n.d.). Robert Harry Lowie, lecture notes for Anthropology 124, ‘Primitive Religion.’ https://bancroft.berkeley.edu/Exhibits/anthro/6curriculum1_anthropology124.html
Banchik, A. V. (2018). Too dangerous to disclose? FOIA, courtroom “visual theory,” and the legal battle over detainee abuse photographs. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1164-1187.
Banyard, P., Winder, B., Norman, C., & Dillon, G. (2022). Essential research methods in psychology. Sage.
Barley, J., & Sullivan, K. (2022, March/April). Take a good look at yourself: A study in self-evaluation. AALL Spectrum, 16-19.
Bavli, H. J., & Felter, J. (2018). The admissibility of sampling evidence to prove individual damages in class actions. Boston College Law Review, 59(2), 655-724.
Bell, M. (2007). The obligation thesis: Understanding the persistent ‘Black voice’ in modern legal scholarship. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 68(3), 643-99.
Ben-David, J. (1992). Centers of learning: Britain, France, German, United States. Routledge.
Benesh, S. C. (2002). The U.S. Court of Appeals and the law of confessions: Perspectives on the hierarchy of justice. LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-86.
Berryessa, C. M. (2021). Modeling “remorse bias” in probation narratives: Examining social cognition and judgments of implicit violence during sentencing. Journal of Social Issues, 78(2), 452-482.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. Center for Open Education/University of Minnesota’s College of Education and Human Development. https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/79
Blackstone, A./Saylor Foundation. (2012). Principles of sociological inquiry – qualitative and quantitative methods. Center for Open Education/University of Minnesota’s College of Education and Human Development. https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods
Bondurant, B. C. (1909). The status of the classics in the South. The Classical Journal, 5(2), 59-67.
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Gray, D. (2017). Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge University Press.
Brayne, S., Levy, K., & Newell, B. C. (2018). Visual data and the law. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1149-1163.
Burchfield, J. W. (2021). Tomorrow’s law libraries: Academic law librarians forging the way to the future in the new world of legal education. Law Library Journal, 113(1), 5-30.
Buxton, M. (1984). The influence of William James on John Dewey’s early work. Journal of the History of Ideas, 45(3), 451-463.
C
Callister, P. D., & Neacsu, D. (2021). An ecological and holistic analysis of the epistemic value of law libraries. Law Library Journal, 113(4), 241-318.
Cannan, J. 2022. (March/April). Take a good look at yourself: A study in self-evaluation. AALL Spectrum, 45-47.
Carlson, K., Livermore, M. A., & Rockmore, D. N. (2020). The problem of data bias in the pool of published US appellate court opinions. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 17(2), 224-261.
Carpenter, A. E., Shanahan, C. F., Steinberg, J. K., and Mark, A. (2022, July/August). America’s lawyerless courts: legal scholars work to recommend large-scale changes in lawyerless civil courts. Law Practice, 48-51.
Carpino, L., & Mentkowski, A. (2022, May/June). A closer look at Review-It. AALL Spectrum, 24-25.
Cera, J. (2022). Persistent identifiers 101 [Webinar]. AALL Law Repositories Caucus. https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/his-hig/recordedsessions/recordedsessions/3/
Cera, J. (2021, October 3). The benefits of having your own sandbox. Cardozo Law. https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/sandbox-series/sandboxseries/series3/2/
Childs, M., Davison, A., & Vanderlin, S. (2022, May/June). Reference desk: Pandemic inspired technology adoption. AALL Spectrum, 44-46.
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, 2050312118822927.
Clarivate/Web of Science. (2021). Web of Science core collection reference guide. Clarivate.
Coase, R. H. (1993). Law and economics at Chicago. Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 239-254.
Cohen, M. R. (1923). On the logic of fiction. The Journal of Philosophy, 20(18), 477-488.
Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Cwinn, E., Cadieux, C., & Crooks, C. V. (2021). Who are we missing? The impact of requiring parental or guardian consent on research with lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, two-spirit, queer/questioning youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(6), 1204-1206.
D
Damodaran, A. (2022). Data: current. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datacurrent.html
Davis, A. C., Branham, A., & Klausner, J. (2022, May/June). Talking tech: Providing legal practice technology upskilling support. AALL Spectrum, 38-40.
DeCarlo, M., Cummings, C., & Agnelli, K. (2021). Graduate research methods in social work. https://pressbooks.rampages.us/msw-research/front-matter/downloads/
Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 24(2), 218-34.
Dilworth, R. (2010). Business improvement districts and the evolution of urban governance. Drexel Law Review, 3(1), 1-9.
E
EBSCO. (2021). Searching with wildcards in EDS and EBSCOhost. EBSCO Connect. https://connect.ebsco.com/s/article/Searching-with-Wildcards-in-EDS-and-EBSCOhost?language=en_US
Eiseman, J., Bagnall, W., Kellett, C., & Lam, C. (2016). Litchfield unbound: unlocking legal history with metadata, digitization, and digital tools. Law and History Review, 34(4), 831-855.
Eisenberg, T., Garvey, S. P., & Wells, M. T. (1997-1998). But was he sorry? The role of remorse in capital sentencing. Cornell Law Review, 83(6), 1599-1637.
Eisenberg, T., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Ranking and explaining the scholarly impact of law schools. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(2), 373-413.
Epstein, L., & Martin, A. D. (2014). An introduction to empirical legal research. Oxford University Press.
F
Fan, M. D. (2018). Body cameras, big data, and police accountability. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1236-1256.
Fernandez, A. (2012). Tapping Reeve, coverture and America’s first legal treatise. In A. Fernandez & M. D. Dubber (Eds.), Law books in action: Essays on the Anglo-American legal treatise (pp. 63-81). Hart Publishing.
Flanagan, P., Kilgore, J. L., & Mendez, J. (2022, May/June). Innovation is changing the role of law librarians—And they’re ready for it. AALL Spectrum, 14-16.
Flatley, R., & Jensen, R. B. (2012). Implementation and use of the Reference Analytics module of LibAnswers. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 24(4), 310-15.
Forgeus, E. (1939). Letters concerning some Litchfield Law School notebooks. Law Library Journal, 32(5), 201-05.
Forgeus, E. (1942). An early Connecticut law school: Sylvester Gilbert’s school at Hebron. Law Library Journal, 35(4), 200-03.
Forgeus, E. (1946). Sylvester Gilbert’s law school at Hebron, Connecticut: The students. Law Library Journal, 39(2), 49-52.
Foster, K. A. (1997). The political economy of special-purpose government. Georgetown University Press.
Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed (50th Ann. ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
G
Garingan, D., & Pickard, A. J. (2021). Artificial intelligence in legal practice: Exploring theoretical frameworks for algorithmic literacy in the legal information profession. Legal Information Management, 21(2), 97-117.
Gatton, T. (2022, June 13). Personal communication with Adrienne Kelish [attorney and law librarianship student and research assistant at the University of North Texas].
Geiger, R. L. (2000). The era of the multipurpose colleges in American higher education. In R. Geiger (Ed.), The American college in the nineteenth century (pp. 127-152). Vanderbilt University Press.
Gopal-Agge, D., & Hoyt, L. (2019). The BID model in Canada and the United States: The retail-revitalization nexus. In G. Morçöl, L. Hoyt, J. W. Meek, & U. Zimmerman (Eds.), Business improvement districts: Research, theories, and controversies (pp. 139-158). Routledge.
Gryski, G. S., & Zuk, G. (n.d.). A multi-user data base on the attributes of U.S. appeals court judges, 1801-2000 [codebook], https://artsandsciences.sc.edu/poli/juri/auburn_appct_codebook.pdf
H
Hackney, J.R., Jr. (2014). Guido Calabresi and the construction of contemporary American legal theory. Law and Contemporary Problems, 77(1), 45-64.
Hall, M. A., & Wright, R. F. (2008). Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions. California Law Review, 96(1), 63-122.
Haskell, J. L. (1977). The emergence of professional social science: The American Social Science Association and the nineteenth-century crisis of authority. University of Illinois Press.
Heise, M. (2011). An empirical analysis of empirical legal scholarship production, 1990-2009. University of Illinois Law Review, 2011(5), 1739-1752.
Heise, M. (2014). Following the data and a giant: Remembering Ted Eisenberg. Cornell Law Review, 100(1), 8-11.
Hervieux, S., & Wheatley, A. (2021). Perceptions of artificial intelligence: A survey of academic librarians in Canada and the United States. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(1), 102270.
Hessick, C. B., Wright, R. F., & Pishko, J. (2022, forthcoming). The prosecutor lobby. Washington and Lee Law Review.
Hickman, A., Kearney, J., & Leong, K. M. (2020). Reference work. In Z. Joyner & C. Laskowski (Eds.), Introduction to law librarianship. Pressbooks.
Hicks, P. D. (2019). The Litchfield law school: Guiding the new nation. Easton Studio Press LLC.
Ho, D. E., & Rubin, D. B. (2011). Credible causal inference for empirical legal studies. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 17-40.
Hull, N. E. (1987). Some realism about the Llewellyn-Pound exchange over realism: The newly uncovered private correspondence, 1927-1931. Wisconsin Law Review, 1987(6), 921-969.
Hunton Andrews Kurth. (Winter, 2022). The brief: Financial services litigation quarterly. https://www.huntonak.com/images/content/8/1/v2/81595/The-Brief-Winter-2022.pdf
I
Imbens, G., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
J
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Ripberger, J. T., Copeland, G., Nowlin, M. C., Hughes, T., Fister, A. L., Wehde, W. (2017). Quantitative research methods for political science, public policy and public administration: 3rd Edition with applications in R. University of Oklahoma/OU University Libraries, https://shareok.org/handle/11244/52244
John Hopkins University. (1929). The story of the Institute of Law at the John Hopkins University. Norman T.A. Munder & Co.
Josling, T., Orden, D., Roberts, D. (2010). National food regulations and the WTO agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary measures: implications for trade-related measures to promote health diets. In C. Hawkes, C. Blouin, S. Henson, N. Drager, & L. Dubé (Eds.) Trade, food, diet and health: Perspectives and policy options (pp. 219-237). Food Research Institute.
Joyner, Z. (2022, June 12). Personal communication with Adrienne Kelish [attorney and law librarianship student and research assistant at the University of North Texas].
K
Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., & Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Noise: A flaw in human judgment. Little, Brown Spark.
Kamola, I. A. (2007). The global coffee economy and the production of genocide in Rwanda. Third World Quarterly, 28(3), 571-592.
Kasakoff, A. B. (1999). Is there a place for anthropology in social science history? Social Science History, 23(4), 535-59.
Klafter, C. E. (1993). The influence of vocational law schools on the origins of American legal thought, 1779-1829. The American Journal of Legal History, 37(3), 307-31.
Klitzman, R. (2013). How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(4), 224-229.
Kolendo, J. (2019). Reference analytics as an unexpected collection development tool. Collection Management, 44(1), 35-45.
Kort, F. (1957). Predicting Supreme Court decisions mathematically: A quantitative analysis of the “right to counsel” cases. American Political Science Review, 51(1), 1-12.
L
Landes, W. M., & Posner, R. A. (1993). The influence of economics on law: A quantitative study. The Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1, Part 2), 385-424.
Lane, D. M., Scott, D., Hebl, M., Guerra, R., Osherson, D., & Zimmer, H. (2003). Introduction to statistics. Center for Open Education/University of Minnesota’s College of Education and Human Development. https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/459
Langdell, C. C. (1871). A selection of cases on the law of contracts: With references and citations. Harvard Law School.
Lawless, R. M., & Robbennolt, J. K. (2016). Empirical methods in law (2nd ed.). Wolters Kluwer
Levesque, C., DeWaard, J., Chan, L., McKenzie, M. G., Tsuchiya, K., Toles, O., Lange, A., Horner, K., Ryu, E., & Boyle, E. G. (2022). Crimmigrating narratives: Examining third-party observations of U.S. Detained Immigration Court. Law & Social Inquiry.
LexisNexis. (2022, March/April). Vendor voice: LexisNexis® PatentInsight® is providing an in-depth view of invention around the globe. AALL Spectrum, 50-53.
Lillian Goldman Law Library, Yale Law School. (n.d.) All known digitized Litchfield student notebooks, https://documents.law.yale.edu/litchfield-notebooks/digitized
Linz, R. (2022). Research notebook template. 2022 National Legal Research Teach-In Kit. American Association of Law Libraries.
Llewellyn, K. N. (1930). A realistic jurisprudence –The next step. Columbia Law Review, 30(4), 431-465.
LMA Research Data Management Working Group. Research data lifecycle [and checklist]. https://datamanagement.hms.harvard.edu/about/what-research-data-management/biomedical-data-lifecycle
Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905).
Lowe, M. S., & Wallace, K. L. (2011). Heinonline and law review citation patterns. Law Library Journal, 103(1), 55-70.
Lowe, R. A. (2020). How to evaluate and license an e-resource during a pandemic (without scheduling a meeting). Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 32(4), 307-315.
M
Mahbobi, M., & Tiemann, T. K. (2015). Introductory business statistics with interactive spreadsheets – 1st Canadian Edition. BC Campus/OpenEd https://opentextbc.ca/introductorybusinessstatistics/
Major Crimes Act, 18 USC §1153(a).
Mann-Jackson, L., Simán, F. M., Hall, M. A., Alonzo, J., Linton, J. M., & Rhodes, S. D. (2022). State preemption of municipal laws and policies that protect immigrant communities: Impact on Latine health and well-Being in North Carolina. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 59, doi: 00469580221087884.
Mart, S. N., Litzler, A., & Gunderman, D. (2022). Hunting and gathering on the legal information savannah. Law Library Journal, 114(1), 5-30.
Masters, B. (2020). Academic law libraries post Covid-19 pandemic. Australian Law Librarian, 28(4), 236-245.
McAllister, C., & Brown, M. (2019). Wrangling weirdness: Lessons learned from academic law library collections. Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. doi:10.5703/1288284317168
McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020).
Miguel-Stearns, T., & Ryan, S. E. (2014). The empirical research law librarian. Part 1: Making the case and filling the role. Trends in Law Library Management and Technology, 24, 1-6.
Misak, C. (2013). Rorty, pragmatism, and analytic philosophy. Humanities, 2(3), 369-83.
Mitchell, J. (2009). Business improvement districts and the shape of American cities. SUNY Press.
Moore, U., & Hope, T. (1929). An institutional approach to the law of commercial banking. Yale Law Journal, 38(6), 703-19.
Morrill Act of 1862. (2012). Codified at 7 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.
Moyer, C. (2021). An Oklahoma tribal employer’s guide to conducting business in the Tenth Circuit. Oklahoma City University Law Review, 45(2), 215-264.
N
National Communication Association. (2022). C-brief. https://www.natcom.org/sites/default/files/publications/NCA_CBrief_Vol12_1.pdf
NELLCO. (2021). FY21 ALLStAR official survey [Excel spreadsheet]. https://www.nellco.org/page/AOS
NIH (National Institutes of Health). (2016, March 21). Overall impact versus significance. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/guidelines_general/impact_significance.pdf
O
Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 597 U.S. ___ (2022).
P
Panella, J. C., Iaconeta, C., & Miguel-Stearns, T. M. (2017, November/December). ALLSTAR benchmarking: How collaborating on collecting and sharing data is a win-win. AALL Spectrum, 22(2), 12-17.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
Peterson, E., Grant, J., Roberts, D., & Karov, V. (2013). Evaluating the trade restrictiveness of phytosanitary measures on US fresh fruit and vegetable imports. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(4), 842-858.
Posner, R. A. (1972). A theory of negligence. The Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 29-96.
R
Radthorne, D. (2022, July/August). Living in data: A citizen’s guide to a better information future [book review]. AALL Spectrum, 63.
Ramello, G. B., & Voigt, S. (2020). Let the data tell their own story: A tribute to Ted Eisenberg. European Journal of Law and Economics, 49(1), 1-6.
Reach, C. S. (2022, July/August). Automation from simple to sublime. Law Practice, 56-59.
Reeve, A. C., & Weller, T. (2015). Empirical legal research support services: a survey of academic law libraries. Law Library Journal, 107(3), 399-420.
Rice, M., Broome, M. E., Habermann, B., Kang, D. H., & Davis, L. L. (2006). Implementing the research budget. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 28(2), 234-241.
Ries, D. G. (2022, May/June). Safeguarding client data: Cybersecurity basics. Law Practice, 56-59.
Robert, A. (2019, April 16). Law libraries chart a new direction for the future, new report shows. ABA Journal, https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/law-libraries-chart-new-direction-for-the-future-aall-report-shows
Roberts, D. (1998). Preliminary assessment of the effects of the WTO agreement on sanitary and phytosanitary trade regulations. Journal of International Economic Law, 1(3), 377-405.
Roost, F. (2013). Die Disneyfizierung der Städte: Großprojekte der Entertainmentindustrie am Beispiel des New Yorker Times Square und der Siedlung Celebration in Florida (Vol. 13). Springer-Verlag.
Ross, D. (1993). An historian’s view of American social science. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 29(2), 99-112.
Roth, S., Nace, T., Brintzenhoff, J., Castello, O. G., Nova, V., Pierce, J., Tagge, N., Eger, C., & Dean, W. (n.d.). Systematic reviews & other review types [research guide]. Temple University Libraries, https://guides.temple.edu/c.php?g=78618&p=4251234
Rumsey, M., Allison, J., & Raisch, M. (2020). In memoriam: Three tributes to Dan Wade. International Journal of Legal Information, 48(3), 105-109.
Rutten, G., & van der Wal, M. J. (2014). Letters as loot: A sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ryan, J. E., & Saunders, T. (2004). Foreword to symposium on school finance litigation: Emerging trends or new dead ends? Yale Law & Policy Review, 22(2), 463-480.
Ryan, S. E. (2013). Data, statistics, or secondary statistical analysis: Helping students articulate and acquire the numbers they’re (really) seeking. Perspectives: Teaching Legal Research and Writing, 22(1), 30-34.
Ryan, S. E. (2013, June). Digging in to patron data: What I learned from the law school “facebook.” AALL Spectrum, 20-21.
Ryan, S. E. (2013). The challenges of researching African high court opinions: Ten lessons learned from a four-country retrievability survey. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 32(4), 294-306.
Ryan, S. E. (2014). Rethinking gender and identity in energy studies. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 96-105.
Ryan, S. E. (2015). Teaching empirical legal research study design: Topics & resources. Perspectives: Teaching Legal Research and Writing, 23(2), 152-157.
Ryan, S. E. (2016). Human subjects research review: Scholarly needs and service opportunities. Law Library Journal, 108(4), 579-598.
Ryan, S. (2016). Local-federal definitional divides: Special purpose districts and the challenges of empirical government research. Jurisdocs.
Ryan, S. E. (2020). Judicial authority under the First Step Act: What Congress conferred through section 404. Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal, 52(3), 67-125.
Ryan, S. E., Behpour, S., Bonds, C., & Xiao, T. (under review). Dissonant reflections on a quarter-century of JIEL: Authorship, methods, geographies, and subjects.
Ryan, S. E., Hebdon, C., & Dafoe, J. (2014). Energy research and the contributions of the social sciences: A contemporary examination. Energy Research & Social Science, 3, 186-97.
Ryan, S. E., Hong, L., & Rashid, M. (under review). From corpus creation to formative discovery: The power of big data-rhetoric teams and methods.
Ryan, S. E., & Miguel-Stearns, T. (2014). The empirical research law librarian Part 2: Developing the role. Trends in Law Library Management and Technology, 24, 7-12.
Ryan, S. E., Rashid, M. & Ali, I. (under review). Data-driven empirical research costing: Using scholarly literature, open government data, and formative case studies to plan projects.
S
Sachs, J. D. (2020). The ages of globalization: Geography, technology, and institutions. Columbia University Press.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Sanders, R. (2018). Gene Rochlin, who warned of overreliance on technology, dies at 80. Berkeley News, https://news.berkeley.edu/2018/12/04/gene-rochlin-who-warned-of-overreliance-on-technology-dies-at-80/
Sanyal, D. K., Bhowmick, P. K., Das, P. P., Chattopadhyay, S., & Santosh, T. Y. S. S. (2019). Enhancing access to scholarly publications with surrogate resources. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1129-1164.
Schlanger, M., & Lieberman, D. (2006). Using court records for research, teaching, and policymaking: The Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse. UMKC Law Review 75(1), 153-167.
Schlegel, J. H. (1980). American legal realism and empirical social science: The singular case of Underhill Moore. Buffalo Law Review, 29(2), 195-323.
Schutt, R. (2018). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research. Sage.
Shapiro, F. R. (2021). The most-cited legal scholars revisited. University of Chicago Law Review, 88(7), 1595-1618.
Shapiro, F. R., et al. (2021). Memorial: Daniel Lawrence Wade (1944-2020). Law Library Journal, 113(1), 79-96.
Shapiro, F. R., & Pearse, M. (2011). The most-cited law review articles of all time. Michigan Law Review, 110(8), 1483-1580.
Siegfried, J. J. (2008). History of the meetings of the Allied Social Science Associations since World War II. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67(5), 973-84.
Singhal, A. (2010). Communicating what works! Applying the positive deviance approach in health communication. Health Communication, 25(6-7), 605-606.
Singhal, A., & Rattine-Flaherty, E. (2006). Pencils and photos as tools of communicative research and praxis: Analyzing Minga Perú’s quest for social justice in the Amazon. International Communication Gazette, 68(4), 313-330.
Sovacool, B. K., Ryan, S. E., Stern, P. C., Janda, K., Rochlin, G., Spreng, D., Pasqualetti, M. J., Wilhite, H., & Lutzenhiser, L. (2015). Integrating social science in energy research. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 95-99.
Spears, N. M. (2022, March 11). Oklahoma, tribes clash over jurisdiction after Supreme Court’s McGirt decision. Cronkite News [Arizona PBS], https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2022/03/11/oklahoma-tribes-clash-over-jurisdiction-supreme-courts-mcgirt-decision/
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Pragmatism. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/
Suchman, M. C., & Mertz, E. (2010). Toward a new legal empiricism: empirical legal studies and new legal realism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 6, 555-579.
Sumner, J., & Sexton, L. (2016). Same difference: The “dilemma of difference” and the incarceration of transgender prisoners. Law & Social Inquiry, 41(3), 616-642.
T
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Baird, L., Sandusky, R. J., Lundeen, A., Hughes, D., & Pollock, D. (2019). Academic librarians and research data services: Attitudes and practices. IT Lib: Information Technology and Libraries Journal, 1, 24-37.
Tepper, R., & Keeler, L. L. (2022, May/June). Technology: Tech from the trenches: Managing your practice to avoid common traps. Law Practice, 30-31.
Thayer, H. S. (Ed.). (1982). Pragmatism, the classic writings: Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, Clarence Irving Lewis, John Dewey, George Herbert Mead. Hackett Publishing.
Thomas, G. (2015). The founders and the idea of a national university: Constituting the American mind. Cambridge University Press.
Tietz, J. I., Price, W., & Nicholson, I. I. (2020). Acknowledgments as a window into legal academia. Washington University Law Review, 98(1), 307-351.
Togam, M. B., & Mestri, D. (2021). A bibliometric study on ‘Law Librarianship.’ Library Philosophy and Practice, 6801.
Tracy, M., Braga, A. A., & Papachristos, A. V. (2016). The transmission of gun and other weapon-involved violence within social networks. Epidemiologic Reviews, 38(1), 70-86.
Treasurer of Yale University. (1900). Report of the treasurer of Yale University. Yale University.
Tucker, V. M., & Lampson, M. (2018). Finding the answers to legal questions. ALA Neal-Schuman.
Tyson v. Bouaphakeo, 577 U.S. ___ (2016). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1146_0pm1.pdf
U
USAID [United States Agency for International Development]. (2018). Population-based survey sample size calculator: Companion to the ‘feed the future’ population-based sampling guide. https://www.usaid.gov/documents/1866/population-based-survey-sample-size-calculator
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1979). The Belmont report. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdf
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2021). Texas and Florida had large small-scale solar capacity increases in 2020. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=46996
V
van den Bos, K., & Hulst, L. (2016). On experiments in empirical legal research. Law and Method [blog], https://www.lawandmethod.nl/tijdschrift/lawandmethod/2016/03/lawandmethod-D-15-00006
Varnum, K. J. (2017). Predicting the future: library technologies to keep in mind. International Information & Library Review, 49(3), 201-206.
Veysey, L. R. (1965). The emergence of the American university. University of Chicago Press.
W
Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011).
Watson, A. (2022, forthcoming). The unintentional consequences of unintended datasets. Law Library Journal.
Whisner, M. (2003). Practicing reference . . . Researching outside the box. Law Library Journal, 95(3), 467-73.
Whisner, M. (2016). Practicing reference . . . Data, data, data. Law Library Journal, 108(2), 313-19.
Whisner, M. (2018a). Practicing reference: My year of citation studies, Part 1. Law Library Journal, 110(1), 167-80.
Whisner, M. (2018b). Practicing reference: My year of citation studies, Part 2. Law Library Journal, 110(1), 283-94.
Whisner, M. (2018c). Practicing Reference: My Year of Citation Studies, Part 3. Law Library Journal, 110(1), 419-28.
Whisner, M. (2018d). Practicing Reference: My Year of Citation Studies, Part 4. Law Library Journal, 110(1), 561-77.
Williston, S. (1888). History of the law of business corporations before 1800. Harvard Law Review, 2(3), 105-24.
Wolbransky, M., Goldstein, N. E., Giallella, C., & Heilbrun, K. (2013). Collecting informed consent with juvenile justice populations: Issues and implications for research. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(4), 457-476.
Wollaston, A. F. R. (1912). Pygmies and Papuans: The stone age to-day in Dutch New Guinea. William Clowes and Sons, Limited.
Wright, R. F., & Levine, K. L. (2021). Models of prosecutor-led diversion programs in the United States and beyond. Annual Review of Criminology, 4, 331-351.
Y
Yoon, A. H. (2013). Editorial bias in legal academia. Journal of Legal Analysis, 5(2), 309-338.
Z
Zhao, C., & Huang, J. (2020). The impact of the scoring system of a large-scale standardized EFL writing assessment on its score variability and reliability: Implications for assessment policy makers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100911.